Access & Segregation Review
A targeted look at who can create, approve, and post across finance systems — highlighting toxic combinations and orphaned accounts.
Hong Kong · Internal control reviews
We examine how money moves, who authorises it, and whether the safeguards on your books hold under real pressure — then leave you with findings you can act on.
Our core work maps authorisations, reconciliations, access rights, and exception handling across the processes that feed your ledgers — then tests whether those controls operate as described.
A ranked findings register, a walkthrough of control gaps tied to specific processes, and a remediation sequence your finance and operations leads can own. We do not replace your statutory auditor; we strengthen the environment they will later rely on.
Read the full engagement briefEach offer addresses a distinct stage of financial oversight — preparation, readiness, or follow-up testing.
A targeted look at who can create, approve, and post across finance systems — highlighting toxic combinations and orphaned accounts.
Re-test previously reported control gaps after management says the fix is in place — evidence, not reassurance.
A focused readiness pass on schedules, reconciliations, and open control points before your external auditors arrive.
They spent three mornings in our Central office walking purchase-to-pay with the AP clerk, not just reading our policy binder. The gap on dual approval for vendor bank changes was uncomfortable — and exactly what we needed before year-end.
The draft findings arrived with process maps annotated in plain language. Our board audit committee asked fewer clarifying questions than in prior years, though we still had to negotiate timelines on two IT access items they flagged.
Tell us which processes worry you most — revenue recognition, treasury, payroll, or inventory cut-off — and we will propose a review scope.
Start a conversation